A standardized test, the Common University Entrance Test (CUET), has become a prerequisite for most students who desire to be admitted into well-known central and participating universities in India. The large student population taking the test necessitated the creation of the CUET Normalisation Process, as the fairness of the process in evaluating the students’ results is of the utmost importance.
In this article, we have put together an extensive explanation of the CUET Normalisation Process. We also look at the reasons why this process was introduced, how it operates, and what it means for college decisions. This is important for everyone, whether a parent or a student who is eager to pursue the dream of education.
Why is the CUET Normalisation Process Needed?
CUET is held by the National Testing Agency (NTA) over various shifts and days, sometimes even for the same subject. While the NTA more or less succeeds in adhering to the uniformity of the difficulty of each variation, there may be some discrepancies. Let us take the example of a student attempting the CUET Biology in the first shift and another in the second shift. Several such variations may put some candidates at a huge disadvantage or with an edge over others.
The score of any test can be interpreted in several ways, such as the performance in a completely different test. Owing to such problems, the Agency has come up with solutions using a normalization process that standardizes the marks obtained, taking the difficulty of the blank form into account. In essence, normalisation ensures that different test sessions are fair by making scores across different test sessions statistically similar.
What is the CUET Normalisation Process?
The CUET examination board uses Equi-percentile Equating as a statistical approach to normalizing the test results.
Here is what equates to this in layman’s terms:
- The procedure does not emphasize comparing candidates’ unscored points but instead converts the raw points secured to:
- Percentile scores for all completions of the test across all participating candidates of a single shift. That is to say, the percentile scores, which include all performance marking outcomes, are the total combined of all percentile scores.
- The marks admissible for the overall merit and ranking criteria are also not obtained during test sessions, but of all classes are normalized scores that are calculated by dividing the marks obtained by all possible marks.
A crucial factor in this respect is that over various test sitting sessions, in which a candidate performs, the scoring system ensures that relative scoring is independent of the attending test sitting session.
Step-by-Step Breakdown of the CUET Normalisation Process
Let’s analyze how the NTA performs normalization regarding the CUET:
One:
- Determining Raw Score
- For each candidate, their (raw) marks will be calculated as per the number of correct and incorrect answers given:
- Correct responses: + 5 marks
- Incorrect responses: -1 Mark
- Unattempted questions: 0 marks
Two:
- Percentile Calculation Per Shift
- Candidates are split according to the shift and the subject they came for. Within each shift:
- A score in percentiles (0-100) is calculated for every candidate.
- This percentile shows the proportion of the candidates who scored less than or equal to that expected score.
- For instance, if one of the candidates has a percentile score of 96 out of 100, he performed better compared to 96 percent of the candidates in that shift.
Three:
- Mapping Percentiles to Normalized Scores
- After obtaining the percentile scores from all shifts candidates, these are aggregated and transformed into a standard set of normalized scores using equi-percentile equating.
- That is, the score of a candidate with 96th percentile in one shift is mapped to the same score as a candidate in another shift who is also at the same percentile.
- This methodology resolves the impact of differing levels of challenge across shifts.
Four:
- Final CUET Score
- The final score that is used for ranking and admissions is the score that is normalised, NOT the raw score or the percentile. This score will be used by the universities for merit lists and cut-offs.
A Simple Example
Let’s assume for now that:
- “Shift 1” dealt with slightly more difficult mathematics, and the top score was 170 out of 200.
- “Shift 2” is believed to have had a relatively simple paper, where the highest score was 190 out of 200.
There is no normalization, one would claim that “Shift 2” candidates performed better. But with the normalization approach:
- A student “F1” in “Shift 1” scoring 160 (95 percentile) might be normalized to 185,
- And a student “F2” in “Shift 2” scoring 180 (also 95 percentile) would also be assigned the same normalized score of 185.
That gives the candidates fair treatment in terms of performance against their peers.
CUET Normalisation vs. Percentile Scores
A lot of pupils mix up percentile scores and normalised scores, but they are not in any way similar:
- A Percentile Score: Measures how you performed concerning other people within your specific shift.
- A Normalised Score: Is a final adjusted score that is derived after equating all shifts and is used for actual ranking.
Only the normalised scores are considered for CUET cut-offs and subsequent admission into colleges, whereas percentiles are simply an early step in the process of normalisation.
How Does NTA Ensure Fairness in CUET?
After thorough examination and analysis of certain statistical experts alongside prior experiences with exams such as JEE Main and UGC NET, the process of normalisation for CUET has been developed.
Key elements within these consults included unbiased factors which help assist in accuracy and fairness, such as;
- Robust statistical model frameworks
- Conclusive research driven by data increments and adjustments of scores
- Openness in processes
- The publication side by side of percentiles and normalised scores
This procedure is scientifically valid and embraced globally for use in competitive international examinations that require multiple approaches or command several shifts.
Implications for Students
1. Do Not Worry About The Shift
Don’t worry, students are overly concerned about whether their paper was easy or tough. For those students, thanks to the process of normalisation, rest assured that the value you are awarded corresponds directly to your genuine rank or merit and not your shift.
2. Accuracy Comes First
Because the unadjusted score impacts the overall outcome, prioritise performing as best as you can on your shifts. Do not attempt to estimate too much, as it is damaging.
3. Be Ready for Anything that Can Come Your Way
Since performance normalisation ranks candidates based on their achievement with respect to their peers, effective preparation and time management have a higher likelihood of getting you ahead of the curve.
4. Criticisms and Challenges
Even though the CUET normalisation procedure is fair from a statistical point of view, some candidates and educators highlight issues such as:
- No explanation concerning how scores were mapped
- Incorrectly distinguishing between percentiles and normalised scores
- Oddities in some subject scores
But such occurrences are uncommon, and the NTA has continued to refine the process by issuing scorecards with clear demarcation of percentile, raw, and normalised marks on the scorecard.
Conclusion
The fairness of the examination is fundamentally built on the CUET normalisation process, which is a critical pillar of the exam’s fairness. It achieves balance among students of all shifts by employing percentile-based statistical methods that all students.
In this, verifiable facts can be trusted less than ‘estimate, hope, and aim’. So far, the guarantee students receive is that deviation will not lead to unfair punishment or reward depending on the examination session assigned. The only session that matters is placement against healthy peers.
These are the changing dynamics of CUET as India’s centralised entrance test for undergraduate courses. Meditating on such mechanics can aid students and their guardians in strategically making decisions. Work hard, stay calm, trust the process—and most importantly, the process has undergone scrutiny at every level, ensuring fairness.
FAQs on CUET Normalisation
Q1. Does the CUET normalisation process maintain fairness in its operations?
The process uses statistical models, which are standard in worldwide multi-shift exams, to maintain fairness between all sessions.
Q2. Does the admission process use my raw score as an evaluation criterion?
The admission process relies on your normalised score instead of your raw score.
Q3. Is it possible to achieve a higher normalised score than the marks I received in the raw score?
Your score will receive an upward or downward adjustment based on the difficulty level of your shift.
Q4. Percentile scores and normalised scores have different meanings.
No. The percentile score shows your position relative to others in your shift, but the normalised score serves as a standardized ranking score across different shifts.
Q5. Should I be concerned because my paper seemed more challenging than others?
No need to worry. The normalisation process takes into account paper difficulty, so your performance receives a fair evaluation.
To read more about the topics related to CUET 2025 EXAM, refer to https://www.pulsephase.in/cuet/
( CUET raw score vs normalised score, CUET 2025 result process, CUET percentile calculation, CUET exam scoring system, CUET normalisation example, CUET merit list preparation, CUET normalised marks explained, CUET tie-breaking rules, CUET subject-wise normalisation, CUET total marks after normalisation, CUET rank based on normalised score, CUET exam evaluation process)
